The Head Game of Fan Base Excellence
Is there anything worse than a fellow football fan (much less enemy fan) telling you how you should feel about your team? While the Auburn Spirit is a palpable, real, and a distinctly Auburn phenomenon that we all understand at a near spiritual level, as a fan base, it hardly equates to irrational preseason exuberance, with a few notable exceptions like 2003. Certainly not at the genetically mutant level to which our in-state rival has elevated koolaid consumption, declaring an inevitable national championship each August. If it were not so obnoxious to bear, an SEC fan could nearly admire the crimson koolaid drinker’s childlike faith, teetering as it does so amusingly between slobbery reminiscence, baseless declaration, cognitive dissonance, and utter unintelligence. It is an immutable law of nature in the Bammer “nation” and indeed, a requirement of card carrying membership. Objective analysts need not apply to the Red Elephant Club.
However, alumni and fans who matriculate from institutions of actual higher learning like Auburn University understand that what separates we humans from the animal kingdom is rational thought. And so, we are torn each spring and summer between the sweet inspiration of pure belief as fans, or rugged realism that simply does not tolerate such fanciful longing. It’s the classic internal struggle between the factions of gloom and sunshine which comprise the Auburn family. But the question which haunts me at this pregnant moment in our young season of hope is this: can we as a fan base become an x factor that affects the actual season? As there is a reality of team chemistry and psychology, might there be a fan base chemistry and psychology that influences outcomes? Has a college football team ever been helped or hurt by fan psychology? Methinks so . . .
If you are an Auburn football fan, by now following two blowout victories, you have dealt with a potpourri of fans who are self-appointed psychotherapists, offering you sage wisdom on how you should feel about the 2009 Auburn Tigers. Therein is the fun of football banter at the office and local watering hole in the Autumns of the deep south. Depending on how the particular fan is hardwired emotionally, and what his or her agenda may be, you are either told that you should be excited and optimistic, or cautious and skeptical.
So, listen up Dr. Phils of the football world, I am made of the sturdier stuff of fan psychology. It was forged in a nine-year span of elementary school ridicule during the Barfield drought. I kept the faith, hoped, and the football gods eventually rewarded me with the arrival of Patrick Fain Dye and Vincent Bo Jackson. A one year “fluke” horrific season like 2008 does not begin to shake my Auburn psyche. It was but a non-fatal sucker punch to the mouth in the bar room brawl of football fandom, as I spit blood on the sawdust floor, and muttered, “That the best you got, football gods? Come ‘ere, I got somethin’ for you.”
Still, for the fan with a shorter memory, the 2008 season left a lingering post-traumatic fan disorder that calls for indefinite skepticism today, despite the alluring temptation of back to back flirtations with 600 yards of total offense (that is not a typo).
Just over a year ago, the death spiral was underway, and in the perfect storm of coaching dissension, player mismanagement, and leadership collapse, no AU fan could see how or when it would end. And as is the enemy’s standard operating procedure, we were reminded by the crimson unwashed and their media henchmen of our eternal doom (a big lie we had heard before). A coaching change was ushered in amid the lingering sting of defeat and humiliation. Among most fans, initially, no scenario was too negative to be credible, and any scenario incorporating an element of optimism was dismissed as Pollyanna.
There was an element of truth in this, of course: nothing was impossible. Gene Chizik’s record as a head coach at perennial loser Iowa State could be a predictor of his inability at a big-time program like Auburn. Following such a dismal period in 2008, lots of bad things seemed possible, but that does not mean they were going to happen. In times of crisis, fans – and too often, Auburn fans – fail to make that distinction. Our enemies portend more of the same, doom, incompetence, and defeat. Rinse and repeat. And make no mistake, there is a strategic purpose to the enemy’s prophesies of our doom – if it proliferates airport speeches to our new coach that “. . . we want a leader, not a loser!” The brand is damaged before the product is unveiled.
In the summer of 2003, no story of our stacked talent, and imminent championship, was too positive to be believed. We all recall the misery of Nallsminger that followed. But in the summer of 2009, as new Auburn head football coach Gene Chizik quietly readied his team for his inaugural season, it seemed as if very few stories about the team were too negative to be believed. Following the beliefs of the herd plays into the enemy’s hands, and gets you killed in team and fan psychology. Skepticism would have been very useful in 2003; but optimism, or at least hopefulness, would have been helpful in this year’s preseason. Without forecasting wins and losses, optimism for at least vast improvement was clearly justified we now know.
Skepticism and pessimism aren’t synonymous. Skepticism calls for pessimism when optimism is excessive. But it also calls for optimism when pessimism is excessive! The negative story may have looked appealing, but it’s the positive story – which few believed – which holds the greatest potential for a fan base. If we are incorrectly optimistic, the consequence is merely dealing with unexpected defeat. But if we are incorrectly pessimistic, the consequence can be a toxic air of gloom that damages recruiting, and empty Jordan-Hare seats displayed on national television. And god knows to a man, every player and coach will tell you that a jacked up fan base is the magic potion to championship mojo.
In dealing with each new season - with the future - we must think about two things: what might happen, and the probability of it happening.
And so it went, with pessimism feeding on itself. Last spring, AU fans or observers who dared to point to strengths such as the arrival of a high octane coaching staff were generally beaten down by the thundering herd of pessimists, or at a minimum told it would take three years. And with a degree of justification – 2008 was just that epic as a failure, as both team and coaches found new ways to display bungling with each passing week.
Possible? After the hiring of Gene Chizik, Jordan-Hare stadium could have been swallowed up by the earth in a seismic shift of the earth plates, with scientists discovering later that the San Andreas Fault had an as yet undetected line into Lee County, Alabama. Auburn could have slid into further disarray as a team, and opened the 2009 season with back to back upset losses, and negative offensive yardage.
This just in – neither has occurred. Two games in – and only two – one thing is radiantly clear: rumors of the Auburn Tigers’ demise were greatly exaggerated. Drink a deep gulp of the Auburn Spirit, negative nancies. It is perfectly rational to proudly declare the breathtaking team chemistry that is obvious without going giddy like a crimson koolaider. And if you are of the sturdier fan psychology, and are watching closely (which can be done on the AU football reality show, Auburn Every Day), you have seen glimpses. Coach Gene Chizik is displaying the qualities of a champion. His players universally love him after but one spring and summer, and by all evidence, will run through a wall for him, and for the assistants he assembled. He choreographed a remarkable resolution of the quarterback controversy, managing with his own evil genius, Gus Malzahn, to have created an equal number of smiles and on the field results from both Kodi Burns and Chris Todd. The fan base is stirred to a near frenzy. Careful and skeptical, sure, but delightfully upbeat about the future as recruits we only dreamed about getting on campus are well within Chizik’s reach by next February. None of this guarantees a win this Saturday against a solid West Virginia team, but the probabilities are growing. I, for one, have no intention of betting against this coaching staff’s future success.
Sitting as we are now, on the precipice of a revenge game on a national stage, it may be time to follow the lead of the man with the backward ball cap, Trooper Taylor. Let it all hang out. Leave doubt and restraint for the couch potatoes who stayed home on game day. Act as if ye believe, and belief will be given unto ye. Come to think of it, sounds like what football fandom is all about in the first place.
Not long after Coach Chizik’s arrival at Auburn, I had the privilege of meeting and hosting he and his lovely wife, Jonna, at a charitable event. At some point, I told Jonna how excited we were to have Coach Chizik back at Auburn. She stopped, stared confidently at me, turned and pointed at Gene twenty paces away, looked back at me, and said with a steely glance, “He’s the real deal.” It was hardly the scripted, inauthentic line of a coach’s wife – it was the declaration of a truth held by the woman who knows the Auburn head football coach better than anyone on this good earth.
Mrs. Chizik, I believe. And besides, the probabilities are growing weekly that you are dead on.